Zendy VS Epsilon

讓我們透過對比Zendy和Epsilon的優缺點,找出哪一款更適合您的需求。這份軟體對比基於真實用戶評測,比較了兩款產品的價格、功能、支援服務、易用性和用戶評價,幫助您在Zendy和Epsilon中作出明智選擇,選擇最符合企業需求的那一款。

Zendy

Zendy
Zendy 是一個由 AI 驅動的研究資料庫,擁有 4070 萬篇以上出版物和 110 萬本電子書。存取全球多語言內容,使用 AI 工具並組織研究。獲得 669,600 位用戶信賴。非常適合研究人員、專業人士和學生。

Epsilon

Epsilon
Epsilon: AI-powered scientific search engine. Get factual, cited answers from 200M+ papers in minutes, not days. For researchers.

Zendy

Launched 2018-01
Pricing Model Freemium
Starting Price $35 / monthly
Tech used Amazon AWS CloudFront,cdnjs,Google Fonts,Next.js,Polyfill.io,Gzip,OpenGraph,Webpack
Tag Data Analysis,Knowledge Management,Data Provider

Epsilon

Launched 2023-07
Pricing Model Freemium
Starting Price $4.08 per month
Tech used Google Analytics,Google Tag Manager,cdnjs,Google Fonts,Next.js,Vercel,Emotion,Gzip,OpenGraph,Webpack,HSTS
Tag Data Science

Zendy Rank/Visit

Global Rank 412432
Country United States
Month Visit 92094

Top 5 Countries

7.27%
6.72%
5.06%
4.59%
3.99%
United States Philippines India Nigeria Malaysia

Traffic Sources

2.46%
1.61%
0.23%
8.37%
56.9%
30.42%
social paidReferrals mail referrals search direct

Epsilon Rank/Visit

Global Rank 2285516
Country United States
Month Visit 10348

Top 5 Countries

45.2%
13.13%
9.47%
4.49%
4.16%
United States Vietnam India Germany Morocco

Traffic Sources

5.7%
0.74%
0.11%
8.21%
42.12%
42.98%
social paidReferrals mail referrals search direct

Estimated traffic data from Similarweb

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Zendy and Epsilon, you can also consider the following products

txyz.ai - AI 強化閱讀、搜尋和寫作,徹底革新研究流程,實現無與倫比的效率

ScholarAI - ScholarAI:AI 研究助理。尋找論文、總結重點資訊、視覺化數據,以及建立個人化的學習教材。

Scite AI - Scite 是一個由 AI 驅動的平台,透過 Smart Citations 協助研究人員探索並評估科學文獻,並呈現各項研究是支持或反駁某項主張的結果。現已成為 Research Solutions 的一部分,Scite 已索引超過 14 億次的引文,與 30 多家出版商合作,並服務全球 200 萬名使用者。

R Discovery - 學術研究閱讀變得輕鬆。透過最受歡迎的人工智慧文獻搜尋工具,存取超過 2.5 億篇研究論文。

Scholarcy - Overcome information overload! Scholarcy uses AI to create interactive flashcards from academic papers, helping you analyze & synthesize research efficiently.

More Alternatives